Duff on Hospitality Law

What this means for Washington businesses

Employers in Washington state that use non-competes should take steps now to ensure those agreements are enforceable before January – reviewing and updating agreements already in place, and ensuring that any new non-competes signed in 2019 comply with the new requirements.

The new restrictions for non-competes 

Now, non-competes are governed using a three-prong common law “reasonableness” test. Under the new law, non-competes are void and unenforceable unless each of these requirements is met:

• • Disclosure of terms before employment starts. Employers must have disclosed the non-compete terms to new hires by the time the employee accepts the offer of employment. For an existing employee, the employer must specifically disclose “that the agreement may be enforceable against the employee in the future” (regulations will likely flesh out this disclosure requirement).
  • Independent consideration. Employees must receive independent consideration – some additional pay or benefit they are not already entitled to – for any non-compete entered into after employment starts (required under common law now).
  • Minimum earnings thresholds for employees and independent contractors. Employees must earn more than $100,000, as reported in the prior year’s W2 (for independent contractors, earnings must exceed $250,000). NOTE: These thresholds are subject to inflation increases.
  • Compensation to laid-off employees. If the employer wishes to enforce a non-compete against a laid-off employee, the employer must pay the employee’s full base salary at the time of layoff through the non-compete period, minus compensation the employee earns through subsequent employment.

The legislation also includes the following provisions:

• • Non-competes exceeding 18 months are presumed unreasonable and unenforceable.
  • Employees can sue employers who try to enforce flawed non-competes. The law establishes a private right of action, allowing a court to order a violator to pay the greater of actual damages or $5,000, attorney's fees, and costs.
  • A non-compete with a Washington-based employee or contractor cannot require any dispute to be adjudicated outside the state, no matter where the employer is based.
  • Franchisors are not allowed to restrict franchisees from hiring other franchisees' employees or the franchisor's employees.
  • Employers are prohibited from restricting employees who make less than double the minimum wage from having other jobs or work, with limited exceptions.

Non-solicitation and other less restrictive covenants not affected

The legislation defines “non-competition covenant” as agreements which purport to prohibit or restrain an individual from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business. Importantly, the legislation explicitly does not apply to other types of business protection agreements: confidentiality agreements; covenants not to disclose trade secrets and inventions; covenants related to sale of the goodwill of a business or another ownership interest; franchise agreements; and non-solicitation agreements that prohibit a former employee from soliciting the employer’s customers or recruiting coworkers to also leave the employer.

Plan ahead now

Even as the legislation heads to the governor’s desk for signature, employers can plan ahead and seek legal advice. They should check whether their current non-competes will be enforceable, and, if not, assess whether it is worth the effort and expense to reach new agreements with current employees. Employers should consider whether less restrictive covenants, such as non-solicitation, non-acceptance, and/or confidentiality agreements can adequately protect their business interests.