Last week, we reported that the IRS issued Notice 2020-32, wherein (relying primarily on Code Section 265) it emphatically pronounced that taxpayers receiving Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans do not get to have their cake and eat it too! As a result of the notice, if a taxpayer’s PPP loan is forgiven and, in accordance with the CARES Act, has no cancellation of debt income as he/she/it would otherwise have under Code Section 61(a)(11), the taxpayer cannot deduct the business expenses for which it used the forgiven loan proceeds.
As we explained last week, the government’s conclusion, from a purely academic perspective, makes some sense. In normal times, taxpayers should not get a double tax benefit from a forgiven debt (i.e., a deduction with respect to expenses paid from the loan proceeds and an exemption from tax on the forgiven loan). However, we are not living in normal times.
We suspect Congress did not envision the IRS would impose Code Section 265 to deny deductions for business expenses paid by taxpayers with forgiven PPP loan funds. The result of Notice 2020-32 is simple: For most taxpayers, if their PPP loan is forgiven (in whole or in part), they will have a federal income tax bill totaling 21 cents to 37 cents for each dollar forgiven. On top of that, there will likely be state and local income taxes owing. So much for helping businesses in significant need during these difficult times!
There may be good news coming our way! Legislation was introduced in the Senate on May 5, 2020, which would nullify Notice 2020-32. Senate Bill 3612, strongly supported by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), provides that business expenses otherwise deductible under Code Section 162 funded by forgiven PPP loan proceeds are indeed deductible. The cavalry has arrived!
Senate Bill 3612, labeled the Small Business Expenses Protection Act of 2020, is currently in the hands of the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. Hopefully, it will be introduced to and passed by the Senate this week. Thereafter, assuming it passes the House, it will make its way onto President Trump’s desk for his signature. Keep your fingers crossed!
Maybe taxpayers can have their cake and eat it too after all! If this is not a situation where that should be the case, I suspect I never will see such a situation.
We will follow Senate Bill 3612 and hopefully report its signing into law soon!
PrincipalLarry is Chair of the Foster Garvey Tax & Benefits practice group. He is licensed to practice in Oregon and Washington. Larry's practice focuses on assisting public and private companies, partnerships, and high-net-worth ...
RSS Feed
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on LinkedIn
Larry J. Brant
Editor
Larry J. Brant is a Shareholder and the Chair of the Tax & Benefits practice group at Foster Garvey, a law firm based out of the Pacific Northwest, with offices in Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Washington, D.C.; New York, New York, Spokane, Washington; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Beijing, China. Mr. Brant is licensed to practice in Oregon and Washington. His practice focuses on tax, tax controversy and transactions. Mr. Brant is a past Chair of the Oregon State Bar Taxation Section. He was the long-term Chair of the Oregon Tax Institute, and is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Portland Tax Forum. Mr. Brant has served as an adjunct professor, teaching corporate taxation, at Northwestern School of Law, Lewis and Clark College. He is an Expert Contributor to Thomson Reuters Checkpoint Catalyst. Mr. Brant is a Fellow in the American College of Tax Counsel. He publishes articles on numerous income tax issues, including Taxation of S Corporations, Reasonable Compensation, Circular 230, Worker Classification, IRC § 1031 Exchanges, Choice of Entity, Entity Tax Classification, and State and Local Taxation. Mr. Brant is a frequent lecturer at local, regional and national tax and business conferences for CPAs and attorneys. He was the 2015 Recipient of the Oregon State Bar Tax Section Award of Merit.
