Main Menu
A Journey Through Subchapter S / A Review of The Not So Obvious & The Many Traps That Exist For The Unwary: Part XV – Being an Active Participant in the Trade or Business of an S Corporation Has Its Advantages

C corp vs. S corpIn this Part XV of my multi-part series on some of the not-so-obvious aspects of Subchapter S, I explore a potential advantage that the S corporation has over the C corporation.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as modified by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, effective January 1, 2013, imposes a three and eight-tenths percent (3.80%) Medicare tax (the “Net Investment Income Tax” or the “NIIT”) under Code § 1411 on the lesser of:

    • the taxpayer’s “net investment income;” or
    • the excess of modified adjusted gross income over a “threshold amount” (generally $250,000 for taxpayers filing a joint return, $125,000 for married taxpayers filing a separate return and $200,000 in all other cases).

For this purpose, investment income generally means:

    • gross income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents (other than such items that are derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business that is not a passive activity with respect to the taxpayer or the trade or business of trading financial instruments or commodities);
    • gross income from passive activities under Code § 469 with respect to the taxpayer or from the trade or business of trading financial instruments or commodities; and
    • net gain from the disposition of property, other than property held in a trade or business that is not a passive activity with respect to the taxpayer or a trade or business of trading in financial instruments or commodities.

To arrive at net investment income for purposes of Code § 1411, allowable deductions properly allocable to such income are deducted therefrom.  T. Reg. § 1.1411-4(f). 

Disposition of Shares

Piggy bank under umbrellaSome types of income are exempt from the tax, including income from the disposition of the shares of an S corporation, provided the shareholder is active in the trade or business carried on by the corporation.  On the other hand, gain from the disposition of the shares of a C corporation regardless of whether the shareholder is active in the trade or business carried on by the corporation is subject to the NIIT.

Pass-Through Income of an S Corporation

An interesting provision contained in the legislation provides in general that income passing through to a shareholder of an S corporation who is an active participant in the trade or business conducted by the corporation is not subject to the NIIT.  The NIIT, however, does apply to the pass-through income of a shareholder of an S corporation that is not active in the trade or business conducted by the corporation and the pass-through income of an S corporation derived from the trade or business of trading financial instruments or commodities. 

By contrast, dividends received by shareholders of C corporations regardless of whether the shareholder is active in the trade or business carried on by the corporation are subject to the NIIT. 

This law creates a slight tax advantage for the active shareholders of S corporations over shareholders of C corporations.

Material Participation/Active in the Trade or Business of the S Corporation

A precursor determination to applying the favorable treatment accorded to shareholders of S corporations is whether the shareholder is active or passive in the activities of the corporation.  For this purpose, we look to Code § 469.

In accordance with T. Reg. § 1.469-5T(a), a shareholder will be considered an active participant in the activity of the S corporation if:

    • the shareholder participated in the activity of the corporation for more than 500 hours during the year;
    • the shareholder’s participation in the activity of the corporation constituted substantially all the participation of all individuals in the activity;
    • the shareholder participated for more than 100 hours in the activity of the corporation, and the shareholder’s hours were not less than those of any other participant;
    • the activity is a significant participation activity[1] for the year, and the shareholder’s aggregate participation in all significant participation activities exceeded 500 hours;
    • the shareholder materially participated in the activity of the corporation for any five of the past 10 years;
    • the activity is a personal services activity where the shareholder materially participated in the activity of the corporation for any of the three preceding tax years; or
    • based on all the facts and circumstances, the shareholder participated in the activity of the corporation on a regular, continuous and substantial basis.

Conclusion

Squeegee Hopefully the above discussion clearly illustrates that an S corporation may have an advantage over a C corporation relative to the NIIT.  To qualify for the preferential treatment accorded to an S corporation shareholder with respect to gain from the disposition of shares and the pass-through income, however, the shareholder must be a material participant in the activity of the S corporation under the parameters set forth in Code § 469 and the corresponding Treasury Regulations. 

Stay tuned for more blog posts in my multi-part series on some of the not-so-obvious aspects Subchapter S.



------------

[1] See TAM 202229036 for a good discussion on what constitutes a significant participation activity.

Search This Blog

Subscribe

RSS RSS Feed

Larry J. Brant
Editor

Larry J. Brant is a Shareholder and the Chair of the Tax & Benefits practice group at Foster Garvey, a law firm based out of the Pacific Northwest, with offices in Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Washington, D.C.; New York, New York, Spokane, Washington; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Beijing, China. Mr. Brant is licensed to practice in Oregon and Washington. His practice focuses on tax, tax controversy and transactions. Mr. Brant is a past Chair of the Oregon State Bar Taxation Section. He was the long-term Chair of the Oregon Tax Institute, and is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Portland Tax Forum. Mr. Brant has served as an adjunct professor, teaching corporate taxation, at Northwestern School of Law, Lewis and Clark College. He is an Expert Contributor to Thomson Reuters Checkpoint Catalyst. Mr. Brant is a Fellow in the American College of Tax Counsel. He publishes articles on numerous income tax issues, including Taxation of S Corporations, Reasonable Compensation, Circular 230, Worker Classification, IRC § 1031 Exchanges, Choice of Entity, Entity Tax Classification, and State and Local Taxation. Mr. Brant is a frequent lecturer at local, regional and national tax and business conferences for CPAs and attorneys. He was the 2015 Recipient of the Oregon State Bar Tax Section Award of Merit.

Recent Posts

Topics

Select Category:

Archives

Select Month:

Upcoming Speaking Engagements

Contributors

Back to Page

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of cookies. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Policy.